In a previous blog post, we compared the risk-return characteristics of the Swan Defined Risk Strategy (DRS) against traditional and alternative bond strategies. The idea was to illustrate how the DRS, with its focus on capital preservation, has performance metrics similar to the multi-sector and non-traditional bond funds that have been making their way into institutional portfolios.
But beyond capital preservation, bonds have traditionally served as an income producer. Since the Financial Crisis, it has been the lack of yield in traditional fixed income that drove many institutional investors to multi-sector and non-traditional bonds in the first place.
The low-yield environment was spawned by a “new normal” of worldwide monetary policy focused on stimulating with ultra-low or even negative interest rates and massive liquidity injections into the financial system. Consequently, bonds will be hard pressed to provide the same return streams going forward as they have over the past 35+ years.
In this new yield-starved investment landscape, investment committees and consultants are forced to reconsider how to generate the necessary yield and overall portfolio returns to sustain spending policies and/or meet long-term obligations.
Systematic withdrawals are an option, provided the investment being drawn down, and the portoflio overall, minimizes exposure to major losses in bear markets, as explained in our post “Suffering from Withdrawals.”
However, an investment strategy that can minimize large losses and generate consistent returns over market cycles may sustain systematic withdrawals. While some may also struggle with the notion of actively withdrawing funds versus clipping a coupon, the reality of our low-yield environment is necessitating a change in perceptions for how to generate sustainable portfolio cash-flow.
Because the DRS has historically been limited to single-digit losses in its worst years and has had meaningful participation in up markets, one could make the case it fulfills the role of a distribution vehicle in a portfolio.
To be clear, the DRS does not generate yield like a traditional bond fund with a monthly distribution. Instead, the DRS can be used within a systematic withdrawal plan.
Historically, one could have safely liquidated a percentage of their DRS holdings to generate cash and yet not endanger principal. In fact, if someone implemented a systematic withdrawal plan with the DRS at its inception, the principal value of a DRS investment still grew.
Setting the Scene
Let us walk through a simple, hypothetical scenario:
After 21 years of withdrawals, on December 31st, 2018, an aggregate $12,148,685 had been withdrawn from each option. However, the ending values were quite different:
Source: Zephyr StyleADVISOR and Swan Global Investments, LLC
The final graph below compares the account value of these three options against each other.
Source: Zephyr StyleADVISOR and Swan Global Investments, LLC
Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. DRS results are from the Select Composite, net of fees, as of 12/31/2018. The charts and graphs contained herein should not serve as the sole determining factor for making investment decisions.
The Swan DRS can serve various roles in a portfolio. Over a series of posts, we have made the case for how our unique investment approach can serve can serve as a core equity growth role, a distribution vehicle via systematic withdrawals, even a multi-asset, globally diversified hedged portfolio.
The Defined Risk Strategy was built around the principles outlined by Micah Wakefield in his white paper “Math Matters.” In this paper, Micah identifies four key factors to an investor’s success:
It is our belief that by building a strategy around these four key concepts not only improves returns but also, ultimately, grows wealth and can sustain distributions.
Marc Odo, CFA®, CAIA®, CIPM®, CFP®, Client Portfolio Manager, is responsible for helping clients and prospects gain a detailed understanding of Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy, including how it fits into an overall investment strategy. Formerly Marc was the Director of Research for 11 years at Zephyr Associates.