It’s often said that “timing is everything.” Given the volatile state of the equity markets over the last few decades, that old adage certainly appears to hold true in the world of investing. Timing risk for when one enters and exits the market can have a large impact on the final wealth of a portfolio.
The combination of timing and the unpredictable nature of the markets results in outcome uncertainty. This makes it hard to plan for the future. Whether it’s retirement or starting a new business, timing and outcome uncertainty can cause more stress than is needed, especially for those who take a purely passive investing approach.
A Passive and Bumpy Ride
Those who are passively invested in the markets, usually experience a pretty bumpy ride. To visually showcase this, the charts below provide various ten-year results for the S&P 500. Each period starts at the beginning of a calendar year and extends out for a decade. The first ten-year period stretches from January 1998 to December 2007; the last one runs from January 2010 to December 2019.
As this chart shows, there is a wide degree of variation in ten-year returns. The best decade is the one ending December 2019. The annualized return for that period is 13.56%. This period includes the incredible bull market initiated in early March 2009 and has no bear market.
Conversely, the worst decade runs from January 1999 to December 2008 and includes both the entire dot-com bear market and the credit crisis bear market. The unlucky investor in that date range would have lost an average of 1.38% per year and ended up with a portfolio worth almost 13% less than when he or she started—truly a “lost decade.” A hypothetical $100,000 investment on January 1st over these periods ranged from a high of $356,657 to a low of $87,006.
Certainly, one can see the uncertainty of outcomes when investing at various times in the market and conclude that timing is indeed everything.
So how does one solve this problem of outcome uncertainty with respect to timing while seeking to achieve long-term investment goals?
At Swan, we would argue that consistency is the best solution to the timing issue. If one can decrease volatility by providing consistent returns, the importance of timing fades away.
A Hedged and Smoother Ride
With a smoother and consistent experience, there is a better chance that investors will stick with an investment and their investment plan. Consistent results may provide better basis for financial plans as the outcome uncertainty and timing risk is minimized much more. We seek to do this with our hedging strategy, the Defined Risk Strategy (DRS).
We can see how hedging can help provide a smoother ride in the chart below. It contains the same thirteen decades for the Defined Risk U.S. Large Cap Select Strategy:
The Defined Risk U.S. Large Cap Select Strategy returns display a remarkable degree of long-term consistency. The worst of these thirteen decades was 5.34%, the best was 9.15%. The range of outcomes on an initial $100,000 investment is a low of $168,287 to a high of $240,110. It is also important to note that all but one of the decades include not only the major bear markets of 2000-02 and 2007-08, but also numerous short-term corrections like the Russian default/LTCM crisis of 1998, the “flash crash” in May 2010, and the U.S. debt downgrade in August 2011. The DRS has successfully weathered such events and has historically provided very smooth returns.
The table below summarizes and compares the results of the Defined Risk U.S. Large Cap Select Strategy and the S&P 500:
How has Swan been able to achieve these results?